it’s cheaper than launching and maintaining your bird, they start at 100 million US. Before you’ve paid to put it any sort of orbit! Not even the Likes of BskyB own their own.
Well done to the team for performing an awesome record on. For my own academic interest, what was your Tx power?
Yes, you have to subtract coax and connector losses. At 12 GHz, these become significant. But, yes, 1w transmitter power or about 30dBm and another 23dB net antenna gain to make 53dBm ERP / 200W does make sense. Sorry for being a nit-pick.
We use the full power allotted to us; 1 MHz PEB (power equivalent bandwidth). I guess it’s about 34 dBW hitting the ground. Using LoRa was not meant to reduce RF power, it was meant to deal with all of the interfering transmitters that the low gain/wide beam width antenna sees.
I see! But what about the uplink? I assume what you stated as 1 W is the uplink from the dreamcatcher right? The number seems very low compared to most satellite terminals…
Sorry for not clarifying earlier. Our uplinks are almost always from a teleport, with only minimal testing done through small VSATs. VSATs work just fine for LoRa uplinking, but we already have equipment at the teleports, so it’s less to bother with. The reason that the BUC requirements are so small is because the uplink is coming from a 5-meter antenna. I remember one private channel we had that used a 12-meter antenna, which even further reduced the uplink power requirement.
I see, thanks for clarifying. I had the impression that the previously mentioned 1 W uplink was from the dreamcatcher with its LNB. Do you think such implementation would be possible though? E.g. using the dreamcatcher to transmit SOS messages over the same satellite
Yes, it’s definitely possible. By reducing the uplink power level the BUC size is drastically reduced, which can make for a cheaper Ku-band transceiver. $100 is feasible.